J2EE/WebSphere/.NET: J2EE vs. .NET, TOS/G - GCC, Stuttgart 2002.

THEMES: J2EE | WebSphere | .NET
YEAR: 2002
Login Login
User: Anonymous


LABEL: IBM WebSphere | J2EE | .NET
ORGANIZATIONS: IBM | Microsoft | SUN
PLACES: Stuttgart
TIME: 2002
 

Comments/attachments: Close
 
#8 J2EE vs .Net
.
Some comparisons J2EE vs. .NET ...
..
 
 
 
 
Comparing J2EE With .NET

THEMES: J2EE | .NET
META STRUCTURES: J2EE vs. .NET
2002LABEL: J2EE | XML | .NET
ORGANIZATIONS: BEA | Borland | Microsoft | Sybase
THINGS: CLR | comparison | JCA | JRE
TIME: 2002
Interview: Java creator Gosling says .Net falls short of expectations

THEMES: Sliwa, Carol | .NET | J2EE
META STRUCTURES: J2EE vs. .NET
2002LABEL: CORBA | C# | C++ | J2EE | .NET
ORGANIZATIONS: Microsoft | Sun
PEOPLE: Gosling, James
THINGS: analysis | comparison | criticism | object model | SW-architecture
TIME: 2002
J2EE and Microsoft .NET

THEMES: J2EE | .NET
META STRUCTURES: J2EE vs. .NET
2002LABEL: J2EE | Oracle9i | .NET
ORGANIZATIONS: Microsoft | Oracle
THINGS: comparison
TIME: 2002
Microsoft .NET vs. J2EE: How Do They Stack Up?

THEMES: Farley, Jim | .NET | J2EE
META STRUCTURES: J2EE vs. .NET
2002LABEL: CORBA | C# | J2EE | Java | JSP | SOAP | Swing | XML | .NET
ORGANIZATIONS: IBM | Microsoft | SUN
THINGS: comparison
TIME: 2002
Rumble in the jungle: J2EE versus .Net, Part 1 +2

THEMES: Sheil, Humphrey | Monteiro, Michael | .NET | J2EE
META STRUCTURES: J2EE vs. .NET
2002LABEL: C# | EJB - Enterprise Java Beans | J2EE | JCA | JMS | JMX | JNDI | JSP | XML | .NET
ORGANIZATIONS: IBM | Microsoft | Sun
THINGS: comparison | Development | SW-Engineering
TIME: 2002
The great debate: .Net vs. J2EE - Does one Web services platform dominate the other?

THEMES: Lurie, Jonathan | Belanger, R. Jason | .NET | J2EE
META STRUCTURES: J2EE vs. .NET
2002LABEL: J2EE | Web Services | .NET
ORGANIZATIONS: Microsoft | Sun
THINGS: comparison | Platform
TIME: 2002
.NET versus J2EE Web Services - A Comparison of Approaches

THEMES: Hanson, J. Jeffrey | J2EE | .NET
META STRUCTURES: J2EE vs. .NET
2002LABEL: IBM WebServices | J2EE | XML | .NET
PLACES: Chicago | USA
THINGS: comparison | Web
TIME: 2002
SAP kündigt Microsoft die Freundschaft auf

THEMES: Benoit, Bertrand | J2EE | .NET
META STRUCTURES: J2EE vs. .NET
2001LABEL: J2EE | .NET
THINGS: comparison
TIME: 2001
.
Some simplified arguments .NET vs. J2EE ...
..
  • Sun’s Web Services platform is Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE)
  • J2EE’s main Web Services competitor is Microsoft .NET
    .
  • J2EE vs. .NET – For development
  • .NET provided by a single vendor, J2EE has support from the entire industry
  • .NET marketed Web Services earlier, J2EE is catching up
  • .NET has better tools, making it easier to develop simple web services, J2EE is better for advanced/complex web services models
    .
  • J2EE vs. .NET – For deployment
  • .NET is an immature platform, J2EE is a more mature, proven platform
  • .NET is tightly coupled with Windows OS, J2EE is hardware and platform neutral
  • .NET has a stronger security model, J2EE has a stronger connectivity model
  • J2EE web services cost less to develop and deploy
  • J2EE web services are more scalable and robust
  • J2EE shortcomings are being worked on via the Java Community Process (JCP) and future versions of the JAX (Java APIs for XML) and security APIs
.